| Cafe at Hostel |
| Travel wagon shaped bar |
| Cafe at Hostel |
| Travel wagon shaped bar |

The following article Raised to rampage, made me write this blog and further endorsed my faith in the Indian values and parenting. Pointing towards timid adults and fearless children, the article blames the parents for the UK having ‘most indisciplined and frighteningly moronic youngsters in Europe’.
It is the same fear that instilled disciplined and taught us values. As kids everyone of us was scared of mother, father, or some elder. It was a daunting task to hide those low grades, complaints or mischief from parents or elders for the fear of been punished or scolded. In return were encouraged to obey and respect elders, not to misbehave and still enjoy the joy of childhood. Once my friend mentioned about her professor stamping on the stack of lecture notes while teaching when an Indian student interrupted and asked him not to do that as Indians consider books as god. Another friend working in a fast food chain regularly narrates incidences of how children throw away money while paying for their favourite fries and Diet Coke.
Early days in London we use to adore chubby kids moving around in buggies on the streets and buses. My friend said ‘don’t adore them so much, the same kid will become a spoilt brat when he grows up’. His comment in a sense summed up the youngsters in general we observe here. As many now opine, the youngsters here can use their freedom and independence constructively to show dissent for the right cause instead of looting shops for frivolous reasons. One needs to reflect why opinion leaders have to emphasise parents to ask tough questions to their children.
I was enjoying an ice-cream at Leicester Square when a friend from India called and scolded me for not answering her mail. Reason – she was worried after reading reports of riots in London. I was totally clueless about the latest incidences till I reached home to find my room-mates following the London mayhem on-line.
I knew about riots in North London but for some reason was not ‘glued to my lappy’ to know the details. I was at central London when I noticed some missed calls from friends and relatives in London and Mumbai. A friend informed me about some disturbance at Oxford Circus, the same area I had passed barely half an hour ago. The Oxford Street was as usual buzzing with shoppers and tourists. I noticed a police car screeching away while leaving the area but thoughts of riots in that area never crossed my mind. Harrods, London's famous luxury department stores, was also crowded with shoppers and tourists alike.
I figured my lack of knowledge about the fresh violence was that I was not ‘socially connected’. I don’t use a smart phone and hence was not twitting, updating FB messages or checking in places through Four Square application while enjoying a day out with a friend. This disconnection had kept me away from the panic, confusion, concern, discussion on the internet from policing in London to the fate of India-England test match. Later I came across reports and comments on how BBM was seen as one of the reason for spreading the violence. I stumbled upon this skype interview http://www.firstpost.com/world/how-blackberry-messenger-was-used-to-organize-londons-riots-57418.html , which discussed about BBM’s role in the London riots.
No doubt social networking, internet and technology are playing a greater role in every aspect of life. It’s not even a month since Mumbai was yet again rocked by bomb blasts, one of which was very near to my home (http://tejaldeshpande.blogspot.com/2011/07/when-terror-memories-hound-you.html). I was first informed about the incidence and my family’s well-being only through the net. Today also I am seeing how people are comments and organising messages online, which is a positive sign. I have seen riots and bomb blasts in Mumbai and am now in London for almost a year. This kind of riots and looting needs to be condemned and is not justified. But still I thought to myself – Sometimes is it good not to be ‘socially connected’?
Today I got a mail from Transport for London (TFL) informing about bus route diversion on 14th August due to a cycling test event for London Olympics. Such communication is highly unimaginable for a Mumbai citizen used to unexplained road digging and facing daily traffic snarls. And I realised I am getting used to London’s way of communication and liking it.
One chilly November morning I was late for a morning lecture because of some traffic near the campus. I was fortunate enough to have been allowed to enter the classroom, but the lecturer reminded the late comers about the ongoing gas pipeline work near the campus. This meant we were supposed to factor in that delay and plan our journey accordingly. This was one of the first lessons of travel planning in London as opposed to the assumptions and presumptions of Mumbai travel.
Later I started noticing digital sign boards along the roads at least a week in advance informing about planned engineering works. Importantly the boards apologised to commuters for delay and causing inconvenience. London tube stations have a ‘good service’ sign flashing against a tube line. Once my friend wondered what is ‘good service’. In Mumbai terminology it meant Western / Central / Harbour trains are running on time. Here the tube driver apologises for delay if the tube stops between stations, which was amusing for us in the beginning. Today’s TFL mail mentioned specific bus routes in my area that will be affected and provided a link for further information on those routes. Couple of days back my friend noticed our internet connection was down and we remembered receiving the pamphlet from our internet service provider about possible connection failure from 9am – 1 pm. Aptly our net connection was back at 1.30 pm.

The Maharashtra legislative council members have suggested the government to consider a code of speech that will prevent retired police officers and administrators to leak sensitive information. This is in reaction to some sharp comments from former police officers and bureaucrats on several issues from bomb blasts, security, and infrastructure to various scams.
Today the governments in power are in constant introspection from the civil society, pressure groups and the media. The best fodder in such situations is the former officials in charge of the specific departments. The Indian media regularly features opinions of these officials, who often point out loopholes in implementing schemes or executing some projects. Those in power have began to see this as an violation of official powers where certain decisions and developments must remain classified even if the official is no longer in service. When I pondered over this issue, I thought isn’t it the question of ‘To speak or not to speak ‘in general?
Increasingly the world is becoming a small place with us individual’s donning different roles at different times and through different mediums. There are no strict boundaries or time limits to determine which role are we playing at what time. You are a friend, mother, daughter, son, father whoever and also a manager, politician, sportsman, actor at the same time irrespective of the time zone or geographical boundaries. So often you find ‘views expressed are personal’ on someone’s Twitter profile, making it clear not to link or interpret comments to their professional lives. Then how does one decide what to speak, with whom and when. How does one determine if the particular conversation is official or personal?
British Prime Minister David Cameron’s image comes to my mind. Few days ago he was defending his interactions with the News of the World’s editor Rebekah Brooks in personal capacity. In my brief career many times I have had to think before speaking when casual conversations lean towards your professional role. Importantly you don’t want to reveal things that are not supposed to be shared or spoken prematurely. If this is the genuine thought behind the proposal then the suggestion calls for a consideration. But the intention of blocking fair scrutiny or critical analysis of public issues will certainly be harmful to the democracy.